Budget
cuts threaten Delaware River flood monitoring
Residents downriver fear New York City plan will cripple
warning system.
By Brian Callaway | Of The Morning Call
March 23, 2009
Bob Blasko rows his boat up Maplewood Road in Riegelsville on June 26,
2006, after the Delaware River flooded. The river also flooded in 2004
and 2005. Budget troubles may succeed in scuttling part of the monitoring
system that helps warn of potential dangers along the Delaware River
-- a river that has flooded to devastating effect in recent years.
The plan to ax stream gauges, announced last week by New York City officials
in response to economic woes there, has residents downriver seething.
''They're hypocrites,'' said Gail Pedrick, whose home in New Hope was
swamped three times over a span of 21 months starting in 2004. ''They
say they're trying to help stop the flooding, and yet they are eliminating
gauges that help anticipate the flooding.''
The New York City Department of Environmental Protection helps pay for
a system of about 100 stream gauges throughout that state. The gauges
perform various functions, from helping operate the city's water supply
to releasing water from reservoirs. Some also help forecast floods for
the National Weather Service.The city DEP, in a release, stated that
funding is being cut for 30 gauges -- most this year, a handful next
-- because of a ''need to reduce expenditures during this difficult
economic time.'' The release did not specify how much money would be
saved, and representatives for the department did not return calls for
comment.
Officials with other agencies are now scrambling to figure out how the
move will affect the region's flood warning system.
Gary Szatkowski, meteorologist in charge of the National Weather Service's
office in Mount Holly, N.J., which oversees forecasts for the Lehigh
Valley region, said he doesn't know how long it will take to assess
what the changes would mean.
''It's not a simple thing to answer,'' he said.
Clarke Rupert, a spokesman for the Delaware River Basin Commission,
said officials from various groups are planning a meeting to discuss
the issue and decide whether money can be found to keep some of the
gauges open.
He added that he knows of no plans to close gauges in Pennsylvania or
New Jersey.
Pedrick, one of several residents and activists who have raised alarms
about the potential for further flooding along the river, said the fact
that gauges in this region will remain open doesn't make her feel better
about what's slated to happen in New York.
''It doesn't matter,'' she said. ''All these gauges are important to
us. Anybody who lives below the gauges, it's important to us. ... North
of us, they're the ones that measure the water flow. It's crucial.''
The Delaware River flooded in 2004, 2005 and 2006, causing at least
one death and hundreds of millions of dollars in property damage.
Many residents in Pennsylvania and New Jersey already blame New York
officials for contributing to the floods by keeping their reservoirs
so full. Other officials have disputed the role those reservoirs played
in flooding.
Still, Pedrick said, the latest proposal about monitoring gauges only
bolsters the perception that New Yorkers don't care about what happens
downriver.
''It's just another thing that they're doing to us, so it's no surprise.''
brian.callaway@mcall.com