Call
to release water panned as not enough.
Wednesday, April 09, 2008 - By DOUGLAS B. BRILL - The Express-Times
Some river watchers say Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell hasn't paid enough
attention to New York City reservoirs. Other river watchers said the
governor has paid too much attention already.
Rendell, who is chairman of the Delaware River Basin Commission, asked
the commission last week to release water from New York City reservoirs
to make sure they don't contribute to flooding during a rainy April.
It is unclear what effect the Pepacton, Cannonsville and Neversink
reservoirs have on flooding downstream. But they are frequently filled
or overflowing. Each was overflowing Friday, according to the most
recent commission statistics.
Rendell's call to release the water met criticism.
The Delaware Riverside Conservancy was "certainly pleased that
the governor has finally recognized what we've been saying for a very
long time, that the reservoirs contribute to flooding. It's a good
first step," said Jeff Russo, the conservancy's attorney.
"But unless there is a permanent void so that the reservoirs
do not become uncontrollable, it's difficult to achieve any kind of
true flood mitigation," he said.
The conservancy has pushed for permanent 20 percent voids at the reservoirs.
The Delaware Riverkeeper Network criticized Rendell for focusing on
the reservoirs while, it believes, other factors are to blame for
flood damage. Maya VanRossum, a spokeswoman for the network, said
the reservoir levels are "a political red herring" that
distracts from causes for flood damage.
"No matter what you do with the reservoirs, there's going to
be catastrophic flood damage. What will prevent future damages is
moving people out of the way," VanRossum said. The network, she
said, wants fewer people and buildings in areas prone to floods.
Lafayette College hydrologist Roger Ruggles said releasing water from
the reservoirs would help slow flooding but not entirely stop it.
A study he wrote for the conservancy suggested voids at the reservoirs
could make water levels downstream drop several feet.
"You can't eliminate all flooding but you can take steps to mitigate
the problem. This (Rendell's call) would definitely be a step to mitigate
that," Ruggles said. "There are potential control measures
that are available, and with all the damage that has occurred, I think
we should take opportunities to use them."